Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
tier 1A |
2 |
![]() |
|
3 |
![]() |
|
4 |
![]() |
tier 1B |
5 |
![]() |
|
6 |
![]() |
|
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
Tier 2a |
10 |
![]() |
|
11 |
![]() |
Those wins were pretty ugly, but they got the job done on the road and several teams above them had worse weeks |
12 |
![]() |
Beating Tennessee at home without waters is great, but a loss at home to florida is an ugly loss. Need more consistency |
13 |
![]() |
Kenpom loves you, but you still are only 5-5 in Q1 and your Q1 wins are not great quality |
14 |
![]() |
tier 2b Still have a great SOS keeping them up with 7 losses, but their true road record is egregious and their best wins came in november |
15 |
![]() |
big win @iowa this week |
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
|
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
tier 3 I view all these mid majors as very close now. |
20 |
![]() |
have roughly the same quality of Q1 and Q2 wins as UB, but have an extra loss and a more Q4 heavy schedule. Better quality losses though |
21 |
![]() |
Their resume is Buffalo's, minus the loss to marquette, plus a much uglier Q3 loss, minus 2 Q1 wins, plus 4 Q2 wins. Could go either way |
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
No bad losses, but at some point you have to look at that 3-6 in Q1 and drop them. |
24 |
![]() |
Their blind resume looks great (8 Q1 wins), but nearly every Q1 win is low end and Auburn and St Mary's are overvalued by metrics |
25 |
![]() |
tier 4 Losing at home vs MD isn't great. Getting bailed out by Bohannon at home against teams like indiana is a bad sign |