Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Tier 1: Pretty easy choice, even without Langford they have a better combination of talent and experience than anyone else. |
2 |
![]() |
Tier 2: An easy second for me. Experienced point guard, strong incoming class, good coaching. |
3 |
![]() |
Tier 2: An easy third. I think DeSousa's impact is overestimated, or I would have them second. |
4 |
![]() |
Tier 3: This is where it gets closer. I'm skeptical about the interior defense and outside shooting. |
5 |
![]() |
Tier 3: Mostly comes down to Nwora, although Sutton is one of the more underrated players in the ACC. |
6 |
![]() |
Tier 3: Blackshear, Nembhard, and Lewis are talented enough to make this a borderline top 5 team. |
7 |
![]() |
Tier 4: Big drop from 6 to 7 in my eyes. Maybe still a little high on Maryland, but Cowan/Smith is a top 3 guard/big man combo. |
8 |
![]() |
Tier 4: Cole Anthony is the big piece of course, but I expect to see Brooks make the traditional Roy big man jump. |
9 |
![]() |
Tier 4: A healthy Tillie should be a difference maker. Gilder won't be Clarke, but I expect him to be good. |
10 |
![]() |
Tier 5: Like UVA, a big piece of this is coaching. But 'Nova has more talent. |
11 |
![]() |
Tier 5: See 'Nova. |
12 |
![]() |
Tier 5: The last of the "unknown talent level, great coaching" group. Really a toss-up between TT and UVA, if Clarke is good look out. |
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
|
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |