Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
#1, 2, and 3 look practically identical to me in resume. Nod given to KU, who has a small lead in some of the better efficiency metrics. |
2 |
![]() |
|
3 |
![]() |
|
4 |
![]() |
Absolutely stellar FEAST WEEK. Now the #1 resume. But they have been shooting FAR better than they should, so I expect them to regress. |
5 |
![]() |
|
6 |
![]() |
|
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
Top tier past week vaults them into my top 25. |
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
Can't lose to a terrible Va Tech team like that. |
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
#2 resume in the country (#2 in WAB, #3 in SOR), but I'm not convinced they're truly better than other teams. |
14 |
![]() |
#3 resume in the country but I'll need to see more on offense than offensive rebounds to be convinced to have them higher. |
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
Good resume but they don't look very good: Examples: Walloped by Michigan and only beat #319 ranked Elon by 6. |
17 |
![]() |
Lumberjacks absolutely tanked their resume. Can't be THAT shakey. |
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
Beautiful offense. |
21 |
![]() |
How could you not rank them after a performance like that? They've been playing like a top 10 team, but their resume isn't there yet. |
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |