Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
#1 resume in country. #1 in SOR and WAB. Most Q1 wins, arguably best Q1 record. |
2 |
![]() |
I rank mostly by resume, as if for tourney. Good records v good schedules means a lot. Eye test and efficiency metrics taken into account |
3 |
![]() |
Zona, Auburn, and KU had far and away the best 3 resumes. L thus doesn't drop Auburn below Purdue |
4 |
![]() |
|
5 |
![]() |
|
6 |
![]() |
|
7 |
![]() |
I'd pick them to win v most on neutral court, but their resume simply isn't keeping up with rest of top teams. Only 12 in SOR and WAB. |
8 |
![]() |
|
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
|
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
|
15 |
![]() |
|
16 |
![]() |
Great resume but some suspect play against bad teams at time is dragging them down |
17 |
![]() |
|
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
|
25 |
![]() |
I don't weigh recent games extra heavily. Their resume is still good! #23 in SOR, #29 in WAB |