Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Dominating the PAC 12, the only clear favorite. |
2 |
![]() |
Move to the PAC 12 already, they’re destroying the WCC. |
3 |
![]() |
Everyone else lost, so… |
4 |
![]() |
Here me out here. So many ranked teams lost, at least they had a big win against Illinois. Also Jalen Ivey. |
5 |
![]() |
Big win over Texas. |
6 |
![]() |
I had Auburn at #4, and was criticized relentlessly. Who’s laughing now? |
7 |
![]() |
Winning the in the BIG 12 is good enough to move up to #7. |
8 |
![]() |
Big win over Texas. I guess that’s enough? |
9 |
![]() |
Senior team with two solid wins? Sure, top 10. Only in this economy. |
10 |
![]() |
I’m still confident they could make a deep run in march, and more certain I didn’t know who else to put here. |
11 |
![]() |
DePaul gave em a real run, but this team is still on top of the Big East. |
12 |
![]() |
Losing to the #4 team on the road barely counts as a loss. Sweet 16 is definitely on the horizon. |
13 |
![]() |
Winning is enough to move up. Neither was particularly meaningful. |
14 |
![]() |
Houston is a fraud. Losing twice in a terrible AAC is a bad sign. 4 seed at best. |
15 |
![]() |
Wisconsin > MSU, but Rutgers > Wisc, and Rutgers > MSU. Yet Rutgers is the only one not ranked by ESPN. |
16 |
![]() |
USC has their number, but I figured more than 5 spots was just unfair. |
17 |
![]() |
Just keep winning, just keep winning… |
18 |
![]() |
They beat Michigan, who beat Purdue, who beat Ohio St… it’s a circle of suck. |
19 |
![]() |
|
20 |
![]() |
|
21 |
![]() |
DOWN GOES #1 |
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
Wins over two ranked teams, and now Illinois on Wed at the RAC. They are quickly heating up. |
24 |
![]() |
RANK EM |
25 |
![]() |
I said it last week too; don’t count these guys out. |