Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
The talent level on this team is enormous. Kentucky enters this season as the favorites and it seems that they are their biggest enemy. |
2 |
![]() |
Arizona, like Kentucky, returns a core of their team from last year along with a mix of incoming talent. I expect great things. |
3 |
![]() |
Wisconsin returns nearly the entire Final Four team, and has one of the best players in the country. |
4 |
![]() |
Somehow Duke always makes it work. They find massive amounts of talent, and have the best coach in CBB to use it. |
5 |
![]() |
Less distractions, and more time to build chemistry. UNC is always talented, but can they put that to use efficiently. |
6 |
![]() |
Lost several top players, but Kansas also brings in top talent. Self is an excellent coach with a few good leaders returning to help gel. |
7 |
![]() |
Possibly should be ranked higher. While losing Russ is big, Luke being gone might be a bigger issue. Several returning vets help. |
8 |
![]() |
I was surprised how good Texas turned out to be last year. They should only improve and contest Kansas for that Big 12 title. |
9 |
![]() |
Another year for their efficient PG surounded by upper classmen. I think Virginia will be able to sustain from the loss of their seniors. |
10 |
![]() |
Lost some of their inside game, but they still have Baker, VanVleet, and Cotton. They will still be good. Don't worry. |
11 |
![]() |
Seniors and lights out shooting are two things I can get behind. The Zags look to be explosive and hard to defend this year. |
12 |
![]() |
Losing their two big seniors will hurt, a lot. I think Iowa State will still be able to contend, but the question is who will step up. |
13 |
![]() |
Not as experienced as last year, but the hunger to go further than before should help motivate UF. Hill and Frazier are outstanding. |
14 |
![]() |
Tremendous talent in the backcourt should help make the frontcourt's job easy this season. |
15 |
![]() |
Keeping key pieces from last years run, this team should be able to tear through their conference and contend in March once again. |
16 |
![]() |
Daniels and Napier are huge holes to fill, but Boatwright proved he was capable of leading in stretches last year. Who else will help him? |
17 |
![]() |
The start of the season may be rough, but Mich St. always finds a way to compete with anyone as the season goes on. Dawson is kind of good 2 |
18 |
![]() |
Brown has done a fantastic job of turning SMU around. The talent level is here to make a nice run and come back from the snub. |
19 |
![]() |
This team will be good defensively, but just like last year, the real question will lie in how well the offense functions. |
20 |
![]() |
Hield is a monster, and if transfer Thomas can play, then OK will be able to to have a top tier backcourt. Woodard should maintain form. |
21 |
![]() |
Petteway is very impressive and Nebraska should be able to improve upon last years surprise success. |
22 |
![]() |
Saunders should help lead a talented Harvard team. Losing the seniors shouldn't be a major problem as they have pieces to fill in. |
23 |
![]() |
Brown can shoot lights out while Randle is an outstanding scoring PG. With decent inside play the Cards will compete. |
24 |
![]() |
Iowa had a solid season last year, but ran into a hot Tennessee team. They look to build on their poor end of last year. |
25 |
![]() |
Foster and Gipson should lead a scrappy Wildcats team. Edwards will be a nice transfer from Maine. |