Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Solid starting five with depth. Plus Izzo always works his magic come March. Extending it into April will be this season's test. |
2 |
![]() |
Losing Jackson hurts, but Allen + Duval starting should keep Duke riding high throughout the season. Plus having K doesn't hurt. |
3 |
![]() |
Having some leading seniors like Graham + Mykhailiuk will help the Jayhawks, plus who's betting against Kansas for another Big 12 title? |
4 |
![]() |
Sure it might be all one-and-done players, but six Top 25 players on your roster is nothing to sneeze at. |
5 |
![]() |
Some good incoming freshmen, but replacing 4/7 of your leading scorers hurts. |
6 |
![]() |
Villanova is 129-17 over the past 4 years, but does face some depth questions for their roster. |
7 |
![]() |
Going from MVA to AAC with teams like UCONN, CIN, SMU will be the test of whether the committee was right to give the 30-4 team a 10 seed. |
8 |
![]() |
Thornton coming over from Duke basically is adding fuel to the fire that is their backcourt. Still PAC-12 after dark...anything can happen. |
9 |
![]() |
Bradley leaving hurts their championship title defense, but I can't see Roy Williams and UNC having an off year |
10 |
![]() |
They've been strong over the past few years, and Koulechov should help them this year make a run in the tournament. |
11 |
![]() |
All is quiet on the West Virginia front, but when you have someone like Carter averaging 40% 3-pt / 2.5 steals, that's dangerous territory. |
12 |
![]() |
A 23.1 PPG average a few years ago for Broome will help, but the once-conference favorites take 2nd to the Shockers |
13 |
![]() |
Brown, Huell, and Walker lead the Hurricanes, but how will they fare in the ever chaotic ACC conference? |
14 |
![]() |
They've got some good returners. Can they repeat and exceed their 24 wins from last year? |
15 |
![]() |
They've had a great run the past few years. If Colson can repeat his performance with Pflueger increasing his PPG, expect more tournament Ws |
16 |
![]() |
I mean, the Purdue Hype Train is always a fun ride, but Swanigan got off one stop too early. |
17 |
![]() |
Their backcourt losses this year hurt badly, so a return to the final weekend looks slim. |
18 |
![]() |
I take full responsibility and ownership of this rank choice, but it's Adidas and UofL Trustees fault as well. |
19 |
![]() |
Still should be in good shape from last year, and they've brought in a solid recruiting class as well. |
20 |
![]() |
Strong returners, good freshmen, strong coaching staff. All in front of "The Holy Land" student section. |
21 |
![]() |
Some heave senior losses from last year, but 29 wins for a third year is still possible |
22 |
![]() |
They've got some good backcourt veterans that can lead the team. But will they make their 2nd ever tournament appearance? Let's see. |
23 |
![]() |
No Motley hurts. Will their new and rising talent in McClure and Lindsey step up? |
24 |
![]() |
4 returners with at least 10ppg, including Delgado. But do they have what it takes to knock out the Wildcats? |
25 |
![]() |
They've got their scorers returning plus some solid PGs this year. But can they make a Texas-size splash come game time? |