Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
Resume-based computer poll incorporating Quality Wins, W/L Record, SOS, MOV, and Efficiency. |
2 |
![]() |
Designed to mimic selection and seeding for March, though I'll adjust rankings (maximum of 2 spots) to account for recent play. |
3 |
![]() |
Though designed to reflect March seeding, Efficiency and MOV sway from that, but r included to reflect "better" teams and be more predictive |
4 |
![]() |
|
5 |
![]() |
Either my system overranks TTU, or the committee has underseeded them. |
6 |
![]() |
I get where the committee is coming from with MSU's resume, but the Purdue and UNC wins count for a lot of points in my system. |
7 |
![]() |
|
8 |
![]() |
I get their SOS isn't great, but they have some quality wins - I think they're deserving of at least a 4 seed right now. |
9 |
![]() |
|
10 |
![]() |
|
11 |
![]() |
|
12 |
![]() |
|
13 |
![]() |
|
14 |
![]() |
My system has them a lot lower than what the committee thinks, could be due to their low MOV. |
15 |
![]() |
Committee will understandably seed them lower, but their win @ Gonzaga, strong W/L record and efficiency will keep them high on my rankings. |
16 |
![]() |
|
17 |
![]() |
My system probably overweights them a little. |
18 |
![]() |
|
19 |
![]() |
Their resume is better than Arizona's (who's noticeably absent from my poll. Better MOV & wins, equal SOS, equal W/L, similar Efficiencies. |
20 |
![]() |
Miami win helping a lot. |
21 |
![]() |
|
22 |
![]() |
|
23 |
![]() |
|
24 |
![]() |
Really good wins. |
25 |
![]() |
Bad MOV and efficiency has them low in my rankings. |