Rank | Team | Reason |
---|---|---|
1 |
![]() |
(+2) chaos always makes for a fun week |
2 |
![]() |
(--) if I put these guys #1, they'll stay there all season and lose to a 16-seed again, I don't want that evil on me |
3 |
![]() |
(+1) t-minus 10 days until these guys start playing real teams again |
4 |
![]() |
(+1) I don't know what's more confusing, beating Akron by only 6 on your home court... |
5 |
![]() |
(-4) ...or dropping to the Sun Devils coming off a shellacking off the hands of VANDY. |
6 |
![]() |
(--) who even loses to Kansas anyway? maybe a scrub SEC team, but surely not a PAC-12 GOD TEAM |
7 |
![]() |
(+3) I guess what I'm trying to say here is I've peered into the abyss and now I'm just Bill Walton |
8 |
![]() |
(--) you know what they say, tis better to have loved and lost, than to have lost to Louisville in OT, or something like that |
9 |
![]() |
(+2) now here's a team that played 3 games this week, and looking at the scores, they definitely played those games |
10 |
![]() |
(+7) I had no idea who to put here because everyone's OOCs are just trash... take these guys who beat Oklahoma/NC St/Iowa to date, I guess |
11 |
![]() |
(+1) they could be top 10... but their loss (@Penn St) is worse than Wisconsin (Virginia/Marquette) and the wins are comparable |
12 |
![]() |
(+1) no comment |
13 |
![]() |
(-6) neutral-court loss to Kentucky isn't worth this much of a drop, but those 3 losses just look so tacky |
14 |
![]() |
(-5) protip: defense only works if you score more than you give up |
15 |
![]() |
(--) how do you re-rank a loss @Vandy and a win vs Kansas? I'm just keeping them in place ¯\_(?)_/¯ |
16 |
![]() |
(+3) from here on out is just a blur, everything is just broken this week |
17 |
![]() |
(+3) good job staying undefeated guys |
18 |
![]() |
(NR) back after a week absence, these guys actually have lowkey good wins (Louisville/K-State/Wisconsin/Buffalo) |
19 |
![]() |
(NR) these guys have deserved to be ranked for probably the last 2 weeks, let's amend this error (it's totally not because they won @NU...) |
20 |
![]() |
(+2) now there's a resume-building win if I've seen one |
21 |
![]() |
(-7) it physically hurts to drop them this much but every team above them has a good reason to be there |
22 |
![]() |
(-4) you're still undefeated too I guess |
23 |
![]() |
(-7) they could keep up with the Duke, but they could not juke the Duke |
24 |
![]() |
(--) DROPPED: Furman 21 (D:), Kansas St. 23, Penn 25 (why is this here and not under 25? well...) |
25 |
![]() |
(NR) wins over Miami, Kentucky, and Maryland? if nothing else, I at least want to draw attention to a sneaky good team in a down Big East |